About: The Right to Silence in Transnational Criminal Proceedings, Comparative Law Perspectives   Goto Sponge  NotDistinct  Permalink

An Entity of Type : rdac:C10001, within Data Space : data.idref.fr associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
type
Author
dc:subject
  • Human Rights
  • Law
  • Human rights
  • Droits de l'homme (droit international)
  • Droit international privé
  • International law
  • Droit pénal international
  • Conflict of laws
  • Law.
  • Private international law
  • Droit comparé
  • Droit pénal (droit européen)
  • Comparative law
  • Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law
  • European Law
  • Droit pénal -- Angleterre (GB)
  • International criminal law
  • Droit pénal -- Pays de Galles (GB)
  • Sources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations
  • Droit pénal -- Australie
  • Droit pénal -- Danemark
  • International Criminal Law
preferred label
  • The Right to Silence in Transnational Criminal Proceedings, Comparative Law Perspectives
Language
Subject
dc:title
  • The Right to Silence in Transnational Criminal Proceedings, Comparative Law Perspectives
note
  • This book considers the effectiveness and fairness of using international cooperation to obtain confession evidence or evidence of a suspect or accused person’s silence across borders. This is a question of balance in limiting and protecting the right to silence. The functioning of the applicable law in Denmark, England and Wales and Australia is analysed in relation to investigative and trial measures such as police questioning, administrative questioning powers, covert surveillance and the use of silence as evidence of guilt. On the national level, this work examines the way in which domestic rules balance the right to silence in national criminal proceedings, and whether investigative and trial rules produce continuity throughout the criminal proceedings as a whole. From the transnational perspective, comparative legal analysis is used to determine whether the national continuity may be disrupted to such an extent that cooperation in the gathering of confession evidence causes unfairness. From the international perspective, this research compares the right to silence under the ICCPR and the ECHR to identify the overall effect of cooperating under particular human rights frameworks on the question of balance.
dc:type
  • Text
http://iflastandar...bd/elements/P1001
rdaw:P10219
  • 2016
has content type
Spatial Coverage
is primary topic of
is rdam:P30135 of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Aug 16 2018


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:       RDF       ODATA       Microdata      About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data]
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3229 as of May 14 2019, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (70 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software