@prefix rdf: . @prefix ns1: . @prefix frbr: . ns1:id rdf:type frbr:Work . @prefix rdac: . ns1:id rdf:type rdac:C10001 . @prefix marcrel: . @prefix ns5: . ns1:id marcrel:ths ns5:id . @prefix ns6: . ns1:id marcrel:ths ns6:id . @prefix ns7: . ns1:id marcrel:ths ns7:id . @prefix ns8: . ns1:id marcrel:ths ns8:id . @prefix ns9: . ns1:id marcrel:ths ns9:id . @prefix ns10: . ns1:id marcrel:ths ns10:id . @prefix ns11: . ns1:id marcrel:pra ns11:id . @prefix ns12: . ns1:id marcrel:aut ns12:id . @prefix skos: . ns1:id skos:altLabel "Prejudice in criminal law" . @prefix dc: . ns1:id dc:subject "Responsabilit\u00E9 p\u00E9nale -- France" , "Action publique" , "Int\u00E9r\u00EAt p\u00E9nalement prot\u00E9g\u00E9" , "D\u00E9gradations" , "Abus de confiance" , "Ordre public" , "R\u00E9tablissement prospectif" , "Principe de n\u00E9cessit\u00E9" , "Causalit\u00E9 p\u00E9nale" , "Responsabilit\u00E9 civile -- France" , "Victime civile" , "Responsabilit\u00E9 p\u00E9nale" , "Faux" , "Causalit\u00E9 civile" , "Action priv\u00E9e" , "Trouble" , "R\u00E9tablissement r\u00E9trospectif" , "Destructions" , "Action collective" , "Victime p\u00E9nale" , "Cessation de l'illicite" , "Causalit\u00E9 mat\u00E9rielle" , "Action civile" , "R\u00E9sultat infractionnel" , "Responsabilit\u00E9 civile" , "Dommage" , "Escroquerie" , "R\u00E9paration" , "Environnement" , "Causalit\u00E9 juridique" , "Abus de l'\u00E9tat d'ignorance ou de faiblesse" , "Violences" , "R\u00E9sultat typique" , "Th\u00E8ses et \u00E9crits acad\u00E9miques" , "Remise en \u00E9tat" , "Peine" , "R\u00E9sultat illicite" , "Justification" , "Action p\u00E9nale" , "Pr\u00E9judice" , "D\u00E9t\u00E9riorations" ; skos:prefLabel "Le pr\u00E9judice en droit p\u00E9nal" . @prefix dcterms: . @prefix ns16: . ns1:id dcterms:language ns16:fra . @prefix ns17: . ns1:id dcterms:subject ns17:id . @prefix ns18: . ns1:id dcterms:subject ns18:id . @prefix ns19: . ns1:id dcterms:subject ns19:id ; dc:title "Le pr\u00E9judice en droit p\u00E9nal" . @prefix ns20: . ns1:id marcrel:dgg ns20:id . @prefix ns21: . ns1:id marcrel:opn ns21:id . @prefix ns22: . ns1:id marcrel:opn ns22:id ; skos:note "The notion of prejudice habitually falls within the boundaries of civil law. As a traditionaland inescapable feature of this discipline, prejudice is today sparking off heated debates amongspecialists. Confronted with this new trend, criminal law experts can rightfully wonder about the placeof prejudice in criminal law. If the concept is little used in this law area, it is nonetheless not totallyunknown. However, the study of prejudice in criminal law will have to prove the irrelevance of thisnotion in that regard. This difference between civil and criminal law can be accounted for by thedistinct purposes of these two areas of the law. Whereas civil law aims at seeking redress for harminflicted on individuals, criminal law is guided by the imperative need to protect general interestthrough the maintenance of law and order.Thus, prejudice does not fall within the scope of the criminal offence theory. It is neither taken intoaccount in the process of defining offences by the lawmaker nor in the classification of the offence bythe trial court. Prejudice is not a constituent part of the infringement and thus is not tantamount to itsoutcome. Furthermore, the notion of prejudice plays a limited role in the theory of criminal lawprocedure. If prejudice appears as a condition governing the admissibility of a civil action brought incourt it is because it is perceived as a legal action for damages, for the sole purpose of monetarycompensation. On the other hand, prejudice is not a condition for criminal proceedings with thepurpose of punishing the offence." , "Le pr\u00E9judice est une notion qui appartient classiquement \u00E0 la mati\u00E8re civile. Figuretraditionnelle et incontournable de cette discipline, le pr\u00E9judice suscite aujourd\u2019hui l\u2019engouement dessp\u00E9cialistes de la mati\u00E8re. Face \u00E0 ce ph\u00E9nom\u00E8ne, les p\u00E9nalistes sont l\u00E9gitimes \u00E0 s\u2019interroger sur laplace du pr\u00E9judice en droit p\u00E9nal. Si le concept est peu utilis\u00E9 dans cette mati\u00E8re, il n\u2019est toutefois pastotalement inconnu. Cependant, l\u2019\u00E9tude du pr\u00E9judice en droit p\u00E9nal devra r\u00E9v\u00E9ler l\u2019absence de placepour cette notion en droit r\u00E9pressif. Cette diff\u00E9rence entre le droit civil et le droit p\u00E9nal s\u2019explique parles finalit\u00E9s distinctes qui animent les deux disciplines. Alors que le droit civil a pour objectif lar\u00E9paration des pr\u00E9judices soufferts individuellement, le droit p\u00E9nal est guid\u00E9 par l\u2019imp\u00E9ratif deprotection de l\u2019int\u00E9r\u00EAt g\u00E9n\u00E9ral par le maintien de l\u2019ordre public.Ainsi, le pr\u00E9judice n\u2019a, d\u2019une part, pas de place dans la th\u00E9orie de l\u2019infraction. Il n\u2019est pris encompte ni dans le processus de cr\u00E9ation des incriminations, ni dans celui de leur qualification. Lepr\u00E9judice n\u2019est pas un \u00E9l\u00E9ment constitutif de l\u2019infraction, et n\u2019\u00E9quivaut ainsi pas au r\u00E9sultatinfractionnel. D\u2019autre part, le pr\u00E9judice n\u2019a qu\u2019une place limit\u00E9e dans la th\u00E9orie de l\u2019action en droitp\u00E9nal. S\u2019il appara\u00EEt comme une condition de recevabilit\u00E9 de l\u2019action civile exerc\u00E9e devant lesjuridictions r\u00E9pressives, c\u2019est parce que celle-ci se pr\u00E9sente comme une action en responsabilit\u00E9civile, \u00E0 vocation uniquement r\u00E9paratrice. En revanche, le pr\u00E9judice n\u2019est pas une condition de l\u2019actionp\u00E9nale en r\u00E9pression de l\u2019infraction." ; dc:type "Text" . @prefix ns23: . @prefix ns24: . ns1:id ns23:P1001 ns24:T1009 . @prefix rdaw: . ns1:id rdaw:P10219 "2014" . @prefix rdau: . ns1:id rdau:P60049 . @prefix ns27: . ns1:id dcterms:spatial ns27:id .