{ "items" : [ { "id" : "http://www.idref.fr/250041057/id" "properties" : { "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type" : [ "http://rdaregistry.info/Elements/c/C10001", "http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#Work" ] , "http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/ths" : [ "http://www.idref.fr/074098004/id", "http://www.idref.fr/148863299/id", "http://www.idref.fr/026404494/id", "http://www.idref.fr/060892293/id", "http://www.idref.fr/066831466/id" ] , "http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/pra" : [ "http://www.idref.fr/138504407/id" ] , "http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut" : [ "http://www.idref.fr/19806179X/id" ] , "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#altLabel" : [ "Les manquements au devoir de probit\u00E9, \u00E9tude critique de l'internationalisation du droit p\u00E9nal" ] , "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/subject" : [ "Th\u00E8ses et \u00E9crits acad\u00E9miques", "D\u00E9ontologie du fonctionnaire -- France", "Honn\u00EAtet\u00E9 -- Dispositions p\u00E9nales", "Droit p\u00E9nal -- France", "Honn\u00EAtet\u00E9 -- Droit", "Honn\u00EAtet\u00E9 -- Droit -- Dispositions p\u00E9nales" ] , "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel" : [ "La probit\u00E9 publique en droit p\u00E9nal" ] , "http://purl.org/dc/terms/language" : [ "http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-3/fra" ] , "http://purl.org/dc/terms/subject" : [ "http://www.idref.fr/027466892/id", "http://www.idref.fr/027253139/id", "http://www.idref.fr/027466868/id", "http://www.idref.fr/027741257/id", "http://www.idref.fr/027843734/id", "http://www.idref.fr/028686047/id" ] , "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title" : [ "La probit\u00E9 publique en droit p\u00E9nal" ] , "http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/dgg" : [ "http://www.idref.fr/190915757/id" ] , "http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/opn" : [ "http://www.idref.fr/059681241/id", "http://www.idref.fr/05962292X/id" ] , "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#note" : [ "Le Code p\u00E9nal consacre au sein de son Livre IV une section intitul\u00E9e \u00AB Des manquements au devoir de probit\u00E9 \u00BB, h\u00E9ritage de l\u2019ancienne forfaiture. La cat\u00E9gorie n\u2019a cess\u00E9 d\u2019\u00E9voluer au plan interne, appuy\u00E9 par le droit p\u00E9nal international, puisque ce ne sont pas moi de six conventions p\u00E9nales qui l'influencent aujourd'hui. Il en ressort un v\u00E9ritable foisonnement normatif qui repose pour l\u2019essentiel sur l\u2019incrimination. Son \u00E9tude m\u00E9thodique permet d\u2019observer un droit p\u00E9nal arrach\u00E9 de son ultima ratio, mettant \u00E0 mal sa fonction dissuasive. La p\u00E9dagogie du Code p\u00E9nal est \u00E9galement atteinte \u00E0 l\u2019heure o\u00F9 les manquements vis\u00E9s n\u2019annoncent plus clairement ce qu\u2019ils r\u00E9priment. Dans ce contexte, depuis 2013, le l\u00E9gislateur a fait de l\u2019exemplarit\u00E9 la toile de fond de la probit\u00E9 publique. Au-del\u00E0 de l\u2019affichage individuel, le travail de recherche invite \u00E0 s\u2019interroger sur la mise en \u0153uvre d\u2019une telle fonction par le droit p\u00E9nal. Un \u00AB manquement \u00BB a une connotation morale plus forte que la violation d\u2019une r\u00E8gle juridique. Un \u00AB devoir \u00BB suppose une r\u00E8gle plus sociale qu\u2019une simple obligation. C\u2019est dire que la r\u00E9pression entend punir un \u00AB faire-valoir \u00BB, pour donner une consistance \u00E0 la chose publique dans laquelle la soci\u00E9t\u00E9 croit et dont les personnes exer\u00E7ant une fonction publique sont les gardiens. Ces incriminations moralisatrices resserr\u00E9es autour d\u2019une responsabilit\u00E9 p\u00E9nale \u00E0 fondement social permettent de faire appara\u00EEtre la p\u00E9nalit\u00E9 sous un nouveau jour. En se recentrant sur son application, la th\u00E8se red\u00E9couvre ainsi la fonction d\u2019exemplarit\u00E9 du droit p\u00E9nal.", "Book IV of the Criminal Code is devoted to a section entitled \u00AB Failures in the duty of probity \u00BB, formerly referred to in French law as \u00AB forfaiture \u00BB, i.e. serious abuse of office. This category has constantly evolved in domestic law, under the influence of international criminal law, since today it is concerned by no fewer than six criminal law conventions. The result is a veritable proliferation of legislation based mainly on the creation of offences. Its systematic review reveals criminal law torn from its ultima ratio, undermining its dissuasive function. The educational aspect of the Criminal Code is also diminished when it is no longer clear what is repressed in the targeted failures. In this context, since 2013, legislation has set failures in the duty of probity against the backdrop of exemplarity. Going beyond an individual stand, this research invites us to question such an approach by criminal law. \u00AB Failure \u00BB has a moral undertone greater than the breach of a legal rule. A \u00AB duty \u00BB implies a rule more social than a simple obligation. This means that repression intends punishing a \u00AB foil \u00BB, which, by contrast, gives substance to the public good in which society believes and for which individuals performing a public function are the guardians. These moralising regulations to punish defined offenses, based on the notion of socially-founded criminal responsibility, allow the penalty to be seen in a new light. By refocusing on its application, the analysis thus rediscovers the function of exemplarity in criminal law." ] , "http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/type" : [ "Text" ] , "http://iflastandards.info/ns/isbd/elements/P1001" : [ "http://iflastandards.info/ns/isbd/terms/contentform/T1009" ] , "http://rdaregistry.info/Elements/w/P10219" : [ "2016" ] , "http://rdaregistry.info/Elements/u/P60049" : [ "http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAContentType/1020" ] , "http://purl.org/dc/terms/spatial" : [ "http://www.idref.fr/027226794/id"] } } }